Appeals court rejects Kalshi’s bid to shield sports contracts from state gambling laws
The Sixth Circuit ruled that Kalshi had not shown its sports event contracts qualify as swaps under federal commodities law, and said the law does not preempt Ohio and Tennessee from enforcing gambling rules. The decision adds to a split with the Third Circuit; a Supreme Court petition on the issue is pending, while the cases return to lower courts.
What changed Tennessee’s enforcement block was vacated, while Ohio’s refusal to shield Kalshi was upheld, removing the differing injunction outcomes in those two cases.
Why it matters For Kalshi and competing venues, federal registration may not provide a single nationwide operating framework: applicable state gambling laws could bring differing licensing, tax and access restrictions.
What to watch next Kalshi’s response to New Jersey’s Supreme Court petition is currently due November 9. Whether the Court accepts the case remains unresolved.
FinanceFeeds ↗